ArticleEuropean heart journal open2026
Impact of differences in kidney function estimation by creatinine compared to cystatin C on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Article in European heart journal open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02105844 (Swiss Atrial Fibrillation Cohort Study - SWISS AF), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Swiss Atrial Fibrillation Cohort Study - SWISS AF
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Which kidney function estimate should guide anticoagulant dosing and risk assessment in atrial fibrillation?European heart journal open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Differences between cystatin C-based and creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate estimations (eGFRdiff) have been associated with adverse outcomes. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of eGFRdiff and its association with clinical outcomes and brain lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and results: We analysed 3804 patients with AF enrolled in two prospective, multicentre cohort studies. The eGFRdiff was calculated by 'cystatin C-based eGFR-creatinine-based eGFR'. Patients were stratified into three groups: eGFRdiff >10, -10 to 10, and <-10 mL/min/1.73 m². Associations with high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), NT-proBNP, major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events (stroke/systemic embolism, myocardial infarction and CV death), first heart failure (HF) hospitalization, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected brain lesions were assessed. The mean age was 71 years, 28% were female, and 49% had paroxysmal AF. An eGFRdiff of >10, -10 to 10, and <-10 mL/min/1.73 m Conclusion: A substantial proportion of patients with AF exhibit clinically relevant eGFRdiff. More negative eGFR difference was associated with elevated cardiac biomarkers, greater burden of ischaemic brain lesions, and increased risk of CV events and HF hospitalization. ClinicalTrialsgov Identifier: NCT02105844.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.