Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42846127›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026

The effects of aquatic interventions on emotional and behavioral outcomes in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Miao Zhao, Cheng Chen, Yupeng Shen, Jiji Zhao, Jiayi Sun

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miao ZhaoSchool of Physical Education & Sports Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Cheng ChenSports Department, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yupeng ShenSchool of Physical Education & Sports Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jiji ZhaoGuangzhou Huangpu District Qimingxing School, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jiayi SunSports Academy, Guangzhou College of Commerce, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) commonly experience emotional and behavioral difficulties that may arise from atypical sensory processing, and the sensory properties of water closely correspond to these characteristics. We systematically evaluated the effects of aquatic interventions on four pre-specified outcome domains-emotion-related functioning, social-emotional functioning, behavioral outcomes, and quality of life-in children with ASD. Eight bibliographic databases and one trial registry were searched from inception to July 2026 using a two-concept strategy without language restriction, for studies involving children with ASD who received a structured aquatic intervention and reported a validated outcome. Methodological quality was assessed using RoB 2, ROBINS-I, and single-case design criteria, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated with GRADE. Owing to heterogeneous outcome instruments and the small number of controlled studies, a meta-analysis was not conducted; in accordance with the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline, findings were synthesized narratively by domain, with the direction of effect and statistical significance tabulated and illustrated in an effect-direction (harvest) plot. Nineteen publications, describing up to 18 independent studies (approximately 320 participants in total from 10 countries, including non-ASD comparison participants; the number of unique participants with ASD is uncertain), with diverse designs and varying methodological quality were included, most of which were uncontrolled and had a high risk of bias. Across all four domains, the direction of effect supported aquatic intervention, and no study showed an effect favoring the comparator. The evidence was most concentrated and internally consistent for behavioral outcomes, for which all six controlled studies favored aquatic intervention, and five reported statistically significant results-although this tally reflects direction only and should not be equated with demonstrated effectiveness, whereas findings for social-emotional, emotion-related, and quality-of-life outcomes were positive in direction but mostly non-significant. Only one trial included an active land-based comparator, so a water-specific effect could not be distinguished. The available evidence suggests a consistent favorable direction across emotional and behavioral domains in children with ASD, but the evidence remains limited, heterogeneous, and at high risk of bias; sufficiently powered trials using active comparators and validated common outcome measures are needed. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420261390044, Identifier: CRD420261390044.

Indexed as

aquatic interventionautism spectrum disorderevidence-based practicesensory regulationsystematic reviewwater-based therapy

Identifiers

PMID42846127
PMCPMC13642286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.