ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
From rejection to vasculopathy: a review of non-invasive biomarkers in alloimmune responses in heart transplantation.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart transplantation is the gold standard treatment for end-stage heart failure. Despite immunosuppression as the cornerstone therapy for post-transplant management, the presence of immunological complications including acute cellular rejection (ACR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV)-remain major barriers to long-term graft survival. Graft monitoring largely remains dependent on protocolized endomyocardial biopsy (EMBx), an invasive, risky procedure. Scope: This narrative review focuses on aggregating the published evidence, summarizing key clinical complications, and presenting the available tools to date. Furthermore, we discuss key limitations which must be addressed to improve patient care, including the need for non-invasive biomarkers in cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Key findings: Significant progress in the development and promising use of non-invasive biomarkers for the detection of graft rejection has emerged over the last decade; particularly for monitoring ACR and AMR. Donor-derived cell-free DNA and gene expression profiling of circulating immune cells have both emerged as promising tools to aide post-transplant management of graft health and reduce EMBx frequency. Soluble protein biomarkers-including hs-cTn, BNP, and NT-proBNP-provide supplementary information on graft stress and injury but lack specificity. In contrast, evidence supporting non-invasive biomarker use in CAV remains sparse. Conclusions: Non-invasive biomarkers have meaningfully advanced rejection surveillance in heart transplantation and hold promise for reducing procedural burden on patients. However, their role in detecting and monitoring CAV remains underdeveloped, and represents the most critical unmet need in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.