ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Optimal sensor set for MEG-based spontaneous and intended speech decoding toward practical communication.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Neural speech decoding has demonstrated great potential as an alternative to current brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers, enabling a faster, more natural way of communication for patients who have lost voluntary abilities, including speech. Most neural speech decoding studies have focused on decoding cued speech, in which participants are presented with visual or auditory signals before producing imagined or overt speech. Only a few recent studies have investigated the decoding of spontaneous and intended speech without external cues using neural activity acquired from a full-scalp clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG) system. With recent advances in MEG technology, including optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) and nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center (NV-diamond) magnetometers, MEG is emerging as a next-generation wearable system for practical speech BCIs. However, it remains unclear how many sensors are needed, where to place them, and what sampling frequency is optimal for wearable MEG devices that require cost-effective, computationally efficient operation. Methods: In this study, we addressed these gaps by using a forward selection algorithm to find an optimal subset of sensors for spontaneous intended and overt speech decoding and by evaluating decoding performance across different frequency bands. Support vector machine and random forest were used as the classifiers in these experiments. Results: Our results indicate that only a small number of sensors (7-8 on average, with a maximum of fewer than 24) are sufficient to achieve decoding performance comparable to that obtained using the whole scalp (more than 200) sensors. In addition, we observed that the Lower High-Gamma (62-125 Hz) band yielded the best performance in some settings, although not statistically significantly higher than other bands in all settings. Discussion: These findings suggest that future wearable MEG devices may not need the whole-scalp sensor set and should support a sampling rate of at least 250 Hz, while 500 Hz is also encouraged, if possible. In summary, these findings provide practical insights for MEG-based BCIs for communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.