Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42845987›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026

From histological recovery to residual gastric cancer risk after

Houshu Tu, Menglin Chen, Panpan Zhu, Jing Hong, Ling He

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Houshu TuJiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Menglin ChenJiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Panpan ZhuJiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Jing HongJiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Ling HeAffiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Successful Methods: Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed were searched through 27 July 2026. Records were deterministically deduplicated and independently screened. Bibliometric networks, thematic structure, temporal bursts, and cited-reference relationships were analyzed. Two reviewers independently classified each publication into one of five mutually exclusive clinical decision domains. Temporal distributions were compared using Pearson's chi-square test, and a research-priority framework was synthesized by triangulating the quantitative findings with representative clinical evidence. Results: Of 778 source records, 283 publications from 1993 to 2026 were included. Reviewer agreement was 78.80% (Cohen's kappa = 0.722). Histological regression and mucosal recovery predominated in 1993-2007 (34.7%), whereas surveillance and prevention (39.6%) and risk stratification (30.2%) became dominant in 2008-2017 and remained the leading domains in 2018-2026. Domain distributions differed significantly across periods ( Conclusion: The field has shifted from asking whether gastric mucosal damage can recover to determining who remains at risk and how that risk should be managed. The resulting clinical decision taxonomy and research-priority framework support future validation of multimodal risk thresholds and comparative surveillance strategies; they do not establish universal surveillance or specific intervals.

Indexed as

bibliometricschronic atrophic gastritisendoscopic surveillancegastric cancerHelicobacter pyloriresidual riskrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID42845987
PMCPMC13642670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.