ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
A multimodal machine-learning diagnostic model for Alzheimer's disease: integrating OCTA-derived retinal microvascular features and clinical variables.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) lacks widely accessible, noninvasive approaches for the evaluation of AD remain limited. We developed a multimodal machine-learning model that integrates retinal microvascular features derived from optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) with clinical variables to classify AD. Methods: In this cross-sectional case-control study, 160 participants (81 healthy controls and 79 patients with AD) underwent macular OCTA imaging. Twenty-seven superficial capillary plexus features, including vessel density (VD), perfusion density (PD), and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) metrics, were analyzed. Logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, and XGBoost classifiers were evaluated using stratified five-fold cross-validation. Feature selection was performed with nested cross-validated recursive feature elimination, and model interpretability was assessed with Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). Results: Patients with AD showed reduced VD and PD across multiple macular subfields. The multimodal random forest model achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC = 0.853), whereas the multimodal XGBoost model achieved the highest sensitivity (0.800) with an AUC of 0.839. SHAP analysis identified whole-macula VD, nasal inner-ring VD, FAZ circularity, and inferior inner-ring PD as influential predictors. Conclusion: These findings provide proof-of-concept evidence that OCTA-derived retinal microvascular features, particularly when combined with selected clinical variables, may help distinguish clinically diagnosed AD from HC in this selected case-control cohort. Their utility for population screening or clinical diagnosis remains unestablished and requires prospective external validation in consecutive, clinically representative cohorts including mild cognitive impairment (MCI), other dementias, and relevant neurological and ocular differential diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.