ArticleQuantitative biology (Beijing, China)2026
Artificial intelligence-enabled cytopathological interpretation of fluorescence microscopy images via a multimodal large language model.
Article in Quantitative biology (Beijing, China), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative analysis of fluorescence microscopy images remains a significant challenge in cytopathological assessments, as subjective interpretation and inter-observer variability hinder reproducibility and standardization of classifications. In this study, an artificial intelligence-assisted analytical framework utilizing a multimodal large language model (MLLM) was employed to classify cytotoxic responses in acridine orange/propidium iodide-stained MCF-7 cells subjected to doxorubicin treatment for 24 h. A total of 500 fluorescence images, collected from five experimental groups including a control and four dose-dependent treatment conditions, were examined to identify distinct morphological indicators of viability, necrosis, and apoptosis. Ground truth annotations were established using a standardized 15-parameter cytopathological evaluation checklist, conducted by domain experts. The MLLM was subsequently tasked with interpreting the same dataset and generating structured cytopathological outputs aligned with expert-defined criteria. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated moderate discriminative performance for viable cells (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.68) and strong discriminative performance for necrotic cells (AUC = 0.84), reflecting reliable identification of overt necrotic morphology. However, early and late apoptotic states showed poor separability (AUC = 0.52-0.55) and were inconsistently distinguished, which can be attributed to inadequate spatial-contextual inference within the model. The entire dataset was processed within 2 h, demonstrating a significant enhancement in analytical throughput relative to manual evaluation. These findings indicate that MLLM-driven cytopathological analysis may serve as an intermediate automation layer between traditional microscopic assessment and fully autonomous deep learning-based image processing systems, facilitating scalable, standardized, and semi-autonomous interpretation of fluorescence imaging data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.