ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Flourishing alongside psychiatric symptoms: a qualitative study on dual-continuum mental health in university students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: University students' mental health is typically assessed through a deficit-oriented lens that equates symptom absence with well-being. Keyes' dual-continuum model challenges this assumption, yet qualitative evidence examining how students in active psychiatric treatment narrate the coexistence of distress and flourishing remains scarce, particularly outside high-income, English-speaking contexts. Methods: A qualitative descriptive-interpretive study was conducted with seven undergraduate students (six women, one man; ages 19-23) receiving outpatient psychiatric care at a university-affiliated clinic in Mexico City. Participants were recruited following a quantitative survey week; those who volunteered for further exploration were interviewed. Semi-structured interviews were triangulated with clinical records and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, integrating deductive categories from Keyes' eleven well-being facets with inductively emergent themes. Results: Five cross-cutting themes emerged: (a) flourishing and psychiatric symptoms co-occurred instead of alternating; (b) the university functioned as an ambivalent microsystem, simultaneously protective and threatening; (c) vital interest operated as a motivational hinge linking emotional, psychological, and social well-being; (d) peer networks functionally replaced family-of-origin support; and (e) institutional disciplinary processes could profoundly compromise psychological safety in a critical illustrative case. Clinical records were consistent with students' narratives of high flourishing alongside substantial psychiatric burden. Conclusion: Flourishing and psychiatric symptoms can coexist within the same individual and narrative. University mental health services should assess flourishing and symptom severity as complementary but distinct tasks, and attend to ecological and institutional factors, including psychological safety around disciplinary processes, that shape students' mental health trajectories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.