Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42845960›Full record

ArticleNanophotonics (Berlin, Germany)2026

Comparing Exciton-Plasmon Couplings in J-Aggregate and TMD-Based Hybrids Using Angle-Resolved Two-Dimensional Electronic Spectroscopy.

Daniel C Lünemann, Daniel Timmer, Antonietta De Sio, Christoph Lienau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel C LünemannInstitut für Physik, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2077-3062
Daniel TimmerInstitut für Physik, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg Germany.
Antonietta De SioInstitut für Physik, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2363-5634
Christoph LienauInstitut für Physik, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent developments in ultrafast two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy (2DES), a powerful tool to unravel coherent couplings in nanosystems, have enabled studies of strongly coupled collective excitons and surface plasmon polaritons. Here, we report a comparative study of two prototypical systems, plasmonic nanoslit arrays covered with either a J-aggregated molecular thin film or a transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) monolayer. Using ultrafast angle-resolved 2DES, we probe the coherent polariton response. We show that in both systems dark or weakly coupled excitons play an essential role for the polariton nonlinearity. In J-aggregate-based hybrids, this results in dominant Rabi oscillations with periods differing from the polariton normal mode splitting. In TMD-based hybrids, we observe a largely enhanced polariton nonlinearity and polariton dynamics showing a rapid relaxation into dark states. We rationalize the observations in both systems using phenomenological model Hamiltonian simulations and show that the microscopic origin of the polariton nonlinearities in the two systems are different. Although the characteristic two-exciton blue-shift is dominant in the J-aggregate-based hybrid, many-body interactions result in a pump-induced reduction in normal mode splitting in the TMD-based system. We anticipate that the presented results will be helpful for the design of active exciton-plasmon systems for ultrafast switching and optical information processing.

Indexed as

exciton–plasmon couplingstrong couplingtwo‐dimensional electronic spectroscopyultrafast spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID42845960
PMCPMC13642113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.