Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42845853›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

From multisensory integration to synaesthesia: a boundary-preserving continuum and research framework.

Kaiyu Qiu, Zixiu Jiang, Ke Jiang, Huilin Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kaiyu QiuCollege of Humanities, Lishui University, Lishui, China.
Zixiu JiangShanghai Sivona Education Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Ke JiangCollege of Teacher Education, Lishui University, Lishui, China.
Huilin QiuCollege of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaesthesia is commonly defined as an involuntary and consistent phenomenon in which stimulation in one sensory or cognitive domain elicits an additional experience in another domain. Yet definitions derived from perceptual psychology, neuroscience, aesthetics, cultural anthropology, and artistic practice often speak past one another. This article proposes a boundary-preserving conceptual review that uses the evolutionary history of sensing as a meta-theoretical platform for dialogue among these definitions. It makes four contributions. First, it clarifies the boundaries among congenital or developmental synaesthesia, acquired or trained synaesthesia, synaesthesia-like associations, cross-modal correspondences, multisensory integration, and cultural or metaphorical synaesthesia. Second, it argues that multisensory integration and cross-modal correspondence provide shared cross-modal resources, whereas synaesthesia requires stricter evidence of individual consistency, automaticity, phenomenological vividness, durability, and behavioral interference. Third, it reconstructs the continuum as a heuristic framework rather than a developmental ladder, thereby preserving diagnostic boundaries while enabling communication across competing definitions. Fourth, it explores a dialogue space between synaesthetic artists and psychologists of perception, with implications for scientific research, education, arts-based learning, and cultural psychology.

Indexed as

4E cognitioncross-modal correspondenceeducationmultisensory integrationneuroplasticitysensory evolutionsymbolic learningsynaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID42845853
PMCPMC13641981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.