Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2026
A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Empirical Antibiotics for Complicated Urinary Tract Infections.
Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Empiric antibiotic selection for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) is increasingly complex due to the rising prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare clinical efficacy and safety among existing empiric treatment options. Methods: We performed a frequentist random-effects NMA of randomized controlled trials evaluating single-agent empiric regimens for adults with cUTIs. The primary endpoints were clinical response (CR), microbiological response, and serious adverse events (AEs). Ceftriaxone served as the common comparator. Results: Forty-seven trials were identified through a systematic search. In the primary analysis of 17 studies published after the year 2000, evaluating agents currently accessible in the United States, in which baseline ceftriaxone non-susceptibility among Enterobacterales averaged approximately 15%. Ceftriaxone demonstrated CR rates comparable to broader-spectrum alternatives. Although some agents achieved higher microbiological eradication, these differences did not translate into superior clinical cure rates. Safety profiles were stable across antibiotic classes, with no significant differences in serious AEs compared to cephalosporins. Conclusions: Ceftriaxone remains an effective empiric option for hemodynamically stable adults with cUTIs in settings with comparable resistance prevalence. These findings provide evidence to support antimicrobial stewardship efforts that prioritize narrower-spectrum agents, preserving broader-spectrum therapies for patients at highest risk for resistant pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.