ArticleNanophotonics (Berlin, Germany)2026
Broadband Electromagnetic Field Prediction at Unseen Wavelengths via Physics-Guided Neural Operators.
Article in Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surrogate solvers that deliver full-wave accuracy across broad spectral ranges can unlock the rapid design and analysis of nanophotonic devices. We present a physics-guided neural-operator surrogate solver that predicts electromagnetic field distributions throughout the visible band from a permittivity map and a query wavelength, including wavelengths unseen during training. Our approach is built on two key ideas: (i) spectral consistency, which formalizes the intrinsic relationship between wavelength-dependent field variations and spatial frequency, and (ii) a conditional embedding framework that comprises a refined wave prior. We validate the approach on three representative nanophotonic platforms-a single-layer metasurface (metalenses), a five-layer volumetric metasurface (spectrum-splitters), and a freeform waveguide for photonic integrated circuits-achieving full-wave fidelity while reducing mean field-prediction error relative to prior operator-learning baselines by up to 80.3% (single-layer), 56.8% (multilayer), and 32.3% (waveguide). The solver remains compact (0.43 M parameters; 86.9% fewer than FNO) and accelerates simulation by
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.