ReviewThe Lancet. Primary care2026
Refinement of a scoping tool to tackle antimicrobial resistance via a primary health care approach: insights from Kazakhstan, Sweden, and Thailand.
Review in The Lancet. Primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
WHO recommends a primary health care (PHC)-oriented health system for delivering high-quality, equitable, and efficient care in all countries. Primary care and the community serve as the frontlines for preventing and managing infections and addressing the rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). WHO developed a scoping tool to identify AMR-relevant interventions that can be used to strengthen PHC-oriented health systems and applied it to country reviews in Kazakhstan, Sweden, and Thailand. The objective was to identify AMR interventions in primary care and the community that are context relevant, improve quality of care, and strengthen health systems. These interventions included the integration of AMR-related efforts, antimicrobial stewardship, and infection prevention and control into health system policies, practice, and governance; promotion of appropriate antimicrobial use, including use of routine health data; stronger pre-service education and in-service training and support for the primary care workforce; and ensuring access to essential medicines while enforcing regulations on non-prescription sales of antibiotics. Foundational elements of health systems such as water, sanitation, and hygiene and immunisation programmes were also essential for a comprehensive AMR response. This process highlighted the need to engage with a diverse range of stakeholders and to consider social and contextual differences when designing AMR-relevant interventions. National AMR programmes should collaborate with health-system planners to integrate AMR-related interventions into PHC-oriented health systems, strengthening them to drive progress in countries towards universal health coverage while achieving global targets on AMR.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.