ArticleResearch square2026
Non-invasive venous waveform analysis and the IntraVAscular volume Number (IVAN) track acute hemorrhage and volume overload in a piglet model.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Acute intravascular volume change is difficult to detect in children; most hemodynamic monitors were developed in adults. Non-invasive venous waveform analysis (NIVA) derives the IntraVAscular volume Number (IVAN) from the peripheral venous waveform. We evaluated whether NIVA tracks acute volume change across hypovolemia and hypervolemia in a pediatric-scale porcine model. Methods: Eight anesthetized, mechanically ventilated piglets underwent controlled hemorrhage (to 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% of estimated blood volume, or until a 20% reduction in mean arterial pressure), then reinfusion and crystalloid-induced volume overload. NIVA was acquired simultaneously with invasive measurements, and IVAN was compared with volume change and invasive measures using correlation and concordance analyzes. Results: Data were analyzable for seven piglets (hemorrhage) and four piglets (overload). Across the combined range, IVAN tracked volume change with 92% concordance (r = 0.68; P < 0.0001), comparable to right atrial pressure (98%, r = 0.69; P < 0.0001) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (89%, r = 0.65; P < 0.0001) and markedly superior to mean arterial pressure (67%, r = - 0.12; P = 0.32). Raw IVAN discriminated 15% and 25% blood loss (area under the ROC curve 0.87 and 0.89; paired reductions P = 0.016 and P = 0.047). Glucose, lactate, and creatinine also tracked volume change; most blood-gas and electrolyte indices did not. Conclusion: In this pediatric-scale porcine model, IVAN tracked intravascular volume change comparably to invasively measured filling pressures and substantially better than mean arterial pressure, supporting further development for pediatric volume monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.