Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42845778›Full record

ArticleBiogeochemistry2026

Large mammalian herbivores influence the deployment of microbial extracellular enzymes to control soil carbon cycling.

Shamik Roy, Sumanta Bagchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biogeochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shamik RoyForest Zoology, Technische Universität Dresden, Pienner Str. 7, 01737 Tharandt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9916-5651
Sumanta BagchiCentre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012 India.ORCID 0000-0002-4841-6748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large mammalian grazers have regulated biogeochemical cycles across 40% of the Earth's terrestrial surface for millennia. While grazer effects on organic matter entering the soil are becoming clear, their effect on the downstream microbial foraging through extracellular-enzymes (EE), which link processes at the cellular level to ecosystem-level flow of matter remain less clear. We assessed how large mammalian grazers influence microbial foraging in soil using two lines of evidence. First, utilising a 14-year-old long-term grazer-exclusion experiment in the Trans-Himalayan ecosystem, we find that activities of seven enzymes peak at different months during the growing-season in an asynchronous manner. Microbial deployment of enzymes responded to grazer-exclusion by shifting from nitrogen (N)-acquisition in spring to carbon (C)- and phosphorus (P)-acquisition in summer and autumn. Grazer exclusion increased peroxidase activity by 124.7% and β-glucosidase by 16.7%. About half of the variation in enzyme portfolios was explained by seasonal differences in grazer effects. Grazer-exclusion increased the variability in the enzyme portfolio, requiring the microbes to forage across a larger portion of the functional space. Structural equation models suggested that grazer-exclusion worsens the quality of biomass input to soil due to an 18% increase in acid-unhydrolysable recalcitrant C. As seen in other ecosystems, this decline in substrate quality raises microbial deployment of generic depolymerizers relative to the specialized enzymes which release assimilable end-products. As greater investment in generic depolymerizing enzymes may reduce microbial carbon use efficiency, it can affect the C cycle. Second, laboratory incubations supported that soil enzymes are indeed inducible/repressible in response to experimental manipulation of biomass quality. Microbial responses appear predictable and generalisable across spatial scales, from laboratory-incubations to whole ecosystems. Hence, fostering microbial functions can enhance the scope and efficacy of rewilding and restoration for natural climate solutions. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-026-01378-0.

Indexed as

Carbon pumpEcoeznymatic stoichiometryMicrobial traitsNatural climate solutionsRewildingSoil microbial enzymesZoogeochemistry

Identifiers

PMID42845778
PMCPMC13642401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.