Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42845762›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Psychosocial outcomes of folk dance interventions compared with other dance forms: a meta-analysis.

Asuman Turan, Zeynel Turan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Asuman TuranPh.D. Program, Institute of Educational Sciences, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Türkiye.
Zeynel TuranDepartment of Turkish Folk Dances, Division of Turkish Folk Dances, State Conservatory of Turkish Music, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the effects of folk dance interventions on individuals' psychosocial outcomes and to compare these effects with those of other dance forms. Methods: A meta-analytic design was used, and experimental and quasi-experimental studies published between 2000 and 2026 were reviewed. A total of 20 independent studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 10 examined folk dance interventions and 10 examined other dance forms. Effect sizes were calculated using Hedges' g, and the main analyses were conducted using a random-effects model. Subgroup differences were tested using a mixed-effects model, and the extent to which dance type accounted for between-study variance was examined through meta-regression. Results: The findings showed a positive, moderate, and statistically significant overall effect of dance interventions on psychosocial outcomes ( Discussion: These results suggest that folk dance interventions and other dance forms may provide comparable benefits for psychosocial outcomes. Nevertheless, the findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the high level of heterogeneity, the limited number of studies, and the possibility of publication bias.

Indexed as

dance interventionfolk dancemeta-analysispsychological well-beingpsychosocial outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42845762
PMCPMC13642181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.