ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Shared community perspectives on how gender shapes coronary heart disease healthcare in Australia: a participatory systems thinking approach.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains one of the leading causes of death in Australia, yet women experience persistent inequities in diagnosis, treatment and recovery. Methods: A community-based systems thinking approach was applied using two, three hour online group model building workshops. Participants ( Results: This study documents the complexity of embedded notions of gender and how these influence patient care in CHD in Australia. The findings demonstrate how professional knowledge, gender bias, community attitudes, and service delivery structures combine in unique ways to reinforce or disrupt inequities in CHD care, particularly for women, affecting the ability for the provision of individualised, tailored CHD care. Conclusions: Gendered assumptions during diagnosis, treatment and recovery influence CHD care, with specific impacts on women, resulting in misdiagnoses or delayed diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.