ArticleResearch square2026
Comprehensive Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Five-Class Sleep Stage Classification Using PPG Signals.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate classification of sleep stages is essential for diagnosing sleep disorders and understanding sleep quality. While polysomnography (PSG) remains the gold standard, its invasiveness and cost hinder large-scale deployment. Photoplethysmography (PPG) offers a non-invasive and wearable alternative, yet most prior work either simplifies staging into fewer than five classes or relies on deep learning approaches with high computational demands. This study systematically evaluates traditional machine learning models for five-class sleep stage classification using PPG data from the MESA Sleep Dataset. A subset of 48 participants was analyzed, with signals segmented into 3-minute windows to enable robust extraction of both PPG-derived and inter-beat interval (IBI) features. Models including Random Forest, k-Nearest Neighbors, and XGBoost were benchmarked, demonstrating that combining PPG and IBI features substantially improves performance. Random Forest achieved the best results, with an accuracy of 72.2% and Cohen's Kappa of 0.65, comparable to state-of-the-art deep learning methods while requiring fewer resources and offering greater interpretability. These findings highlight the potential of feature-based, computationally efficient models for five-stage sleep classification, supporting scalable and clinically relevant applications of wearable PPG monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.