ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Case report and literature review of stent detachment after vertebral artery stenting.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a case of severe stenosis at the origin of the left vertebral artery, which was complicated by stent detachment after stent implantation. We carried out a retrospective analysis of the patient's clinical data and undertook a review of relevant literature. Our goals were to investigate potential risk factors for stent detachment, assess how well conservative management works in such scenarios, and offer evidence to guide individualized treatment for this type of complication. The patient was a 70-year-old male who received a self-expanding Enterprise 2 stent at the origin of his left vertebral artery. At the 2-month follow-up, imaging showed stent migration and detachment into the left subclavian artery. Importantly, there was no evidence of significant vascular occlusion or acute neurological deficits. We managed the patient conservatively with dual antiplatelet and lipid-lowering therapy. After this treatment, his clinical condition improved, vital signs stayed stable, and neurological function was preserved. Our combined analysis of this case and the existing literature indicates that systemic vascular degeneration and the unique anatomical features of the vertebral artery's V1 segment are key contributors to stent detachment. In our experience, conservative treatment can lead to good outcomes for patients who are hemodynamically stable and have no ischemic symptoms. Clinical care should be tailored to each patient to avoid unnecessary repeat interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.