Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42845720›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026

A high-precision synchronization and centroid-based framework for single-trial decoding of perceived natural speech.

Cristian Y Olivares, Norelli Schettini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cristian Y OlivaresDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Norelli SchettiniDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decoding natural speech from EEG is constrained by low signal-to-noise ratios, commonly addressed through event-related potential (ERP) grand averaging. However, this approach acts as a low-pass filter, obscuring trial-to-trial variability and high-frequency neural dynamics. To overcome these limitations, we propose an open-box, FPGA-synchronized framework for single-trial EEG analysis of Spanish vowels (/a/, /i/, /u/). The proposed architecture enforces sub-millisecond hardware determinism, eliminating software-induced temporal jitter and enabling robust extraction of high-frequency oscillatory features, including the Gamma band, without relying on averaged ERPs. This synchronization framework facilitates the separation of early exogenous sensory responses from late endogenous cognitive processing, while comprehensive ablation studies were performed to evaluate the effect of software-induced jitter on decoding performance. Results showed that introducing simulated jitter degraded classification performance to theoretical chance levels (33.20%), confirming hardware synchronization as a strict prerequisite for reliable single-trial decoding. The framework was further validated using a Centroid-PCA-SVM pipeline operating on a 16-channel spatial subset. Using the full proposed architecture, a grand mean classification accuracy of 67.70% was achieved, substantially exceeding the theoretical chance level of 33.33%. The across-participant mean of the maximum fold accuracies reached 83.00%, with individual validation folds achieving up to 90.00%. In contrast, zero-calibration leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) generalization remained at chance level (33.08%; κ

Indexed as

Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)FPGA synchronizationneural manifoldneuroprostheticsphoneme decodingsingle-trial EEGSupport Vector Machine (SVM)

Identifiers

PMID42845720
PMCPMC13642302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.