ArticleQuantitative biology (Beijing, China)2026
Cell dynamics on energy landscape: Comparing attractor detection in Boolean network and diffusion-based models under in silico gene perturbations.
Article in Quantitative biology (Beijing, China), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Steady-state attractor detection differs fundamentally between discrete Boolean network (BN) and continuous diffusion-based models because they operate on different state spaces and exhibit distinct dynamic behaviors. Here, we propose cell dynamics on energy landscape (CellLand) to systematically compare BN and diffusion-based approaches for quantifying cellular dynamics on the energy landscape, with a particular focus on attractor identification under in silico gene perturbations. Although the energy landscape provides a unifying conceptual framework, BN-based models face specific challenges, including state space explosion and pronounced sensitivity to network architecture, when assessing attractor stability and transition accessibility. Nevertheless, BN-based analyses can remain reliable and interpretable when the underlying network topology is suitable, while being comparatively less sensitive to parameter estimation uncertainty and technical noise. Importantly, we show that attractor identification depends critically on network structure, and that no general theory currently exists for optimizing BN topology for dynamic cell-state modeling. Our findings deepen the comparative understanding of BN and diffusion-based frameworks and provide practical guidelines for selecting and designing models for robust simulation of complex gene-regulatory systems under perturbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.