Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42845622›Full record

ArticleImaging science in dentistry2026

Using of artificial intelligence to evaluate image quality for interproximal bone level assessment on bitewing radiographs.

Carolina Tiemi Kuteken, Thiago de Oliveira Gamba, Rafael de Mattos Hahn, André Luis Martinotto, Mariana Boessio Vizzotto, Michael Marc Bornstein, Heraldo Luís Dias da Silveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carolina Tiemi KutekenDepartment of Oral Surgery and Orthopedics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8554-5160
Thiago de Oliveira GambaDepartment of Oral Surgery and Orthopedics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3941-9672
Rafael de Mattos HahnDepartment of Oral Surgery and Orthopedics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3660-6020
André Luis MartinottoGraduate Program in Applied Computing, University of Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7939-0843
Mariana Boessio VizzottoDepartment of Oral Surgery and Orthopedics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3149-7913
Michael Marc BornsteinDepartment of Oral Health and Medicine, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7773-8957
Heraldo Luís Dias da SilveiraDepartment of Oral Surgery and Orthopedics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3456-7043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model capable of certifying whether the quality of the bitewing image is adequate or compromised, as an intermediate tool for the technical analysis prior to the final evaluation of the alveolar bone crest. Materials and Methods: A total of 372 bitewing radiographs from a radiographic database were classified by three evaluators into control 186 (standard vertical angulation) and test 186 (offset vertical angulation) groups, forming a consensus gold standard for accuracy with the algorithm classification. The region of interest was defined as the non-overlapping area between the buccal and palatal/lingual cusps for data labeling, using the YOLOv8n-Seg architecture for training, validation, and testing. The model's performance was evaluated by comparing the average areas among groups, computing the metrics of precision, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, recall and F1 score. Results: The AI model achieved a classification accuracy of 96.7%, with 100% sensitivity and 93.8% specificity (ICC = 0.95). The precision was 0.93, the recall 1.0 and the F1-score 0.96. Across both training and validation stages, significant differences were observed between the test and control groups ( Conclusion: The AI model accurately segmented and classified whether or not vertical angulation was compromising the quality of bitewing radiographs, thereby minimizing errors in the diagnostic interpretation of the alveolar bone crest.

Indexed as

Alveolar ProcessArtificial IntelligenceBitewing RadiographyMachine LearningRadiography, Dental, Digital

Identifiers

PMID42845622
PMCPMC13641969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.