ArticleJournal of gastric cancer2026
Development of an Artificial Intelligence Platform for Surgical Tool Detection and Phase Recognition in Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy.
Article in Journal of gastric cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSurgical tool detection and phase recognition are the foundational areas for objective surgical assessment and future integration with intelligent operative systems. We aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) model for automated surgical tool detection and phase recognition in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective, single-center study, we included 93 annotated laparoscopic distal gastrectomy videos from Seoul National University Hospital. A You Only Look Once version 8 (YOLOv8) model was trained to detect 14 surgical instruments across 60,102 annotated images using a refined tip-focused annotation strategy. The surgical workflow was divided into 12 predefined phases. Tool presence inferred from the YOLOv8 output was structured and used as input for a bidirectional long short-term memory (bi-LSTM) network for temporal phase recognition. Performance was evaluated using the mean average precision (mAP), precision, recall, F1 score, and accuracy.
resultsThe YOLOv8 model achieved a 94% mAP at an intersection over union threshold of 0.50 (mAP50), with a precision >95% for recognizing frequently used tools. The bi-LSTM model achieved a precision of 82%, recall of 84%, F1 score of 83%, and accuracy of 85%. Phase prediction was the highest for clear anatomical transitions and lowest for visually ambiguous phases.
conclusionsThis AI-based framework demonstrated reliable performance in surgical tool detection and phase recognition. Using the YOLO-inferred tool as input to the bi-LSTM phase model improved robustness and scalability. This approach offers a foundation for real-time surgical guidance, quality benchmarking, and structured resident training in gastric cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.