ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2026
Development and Validation of an Interpretable Deep Learning Model for Automated Kellgren-Lawrence Grading of Knee Osteoarthritis Using X-Ray Imaging.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and reproducible Kellgren-Lawrence grading of radiographic knee osteoarthritis remains challenging, particularly for intermediate grades and anatomically heterogeneous compartments. We present X-VIG, an interpretable deep learning framework integrating paired anteroposterior and lateral knee radiographs via view-specific backbones with deformable convolutions, attention-based feature fusion, and dual classification-regression optimization aligned with five-grade clinical practice. Grad-CAM++ visualizations enhance model transparency and support clinical interpretation. In a retrospective cohort (n = 229) with consensus reference-standard KL labels established by double-blinded expert review and patient-level splitting (70%/30%), X-VIG achieved AUCs of 0.9646-0.9945 across five anatomical subregions. Multimodal fusion yielded a mean AUC gain of 5.6 percentage points over single-view models. In a reader study of 50 held-out patients comprising 100 individual radiographs, X-VIG outperformed junior radiologists, matched or surpassed senior performance in most subregions, and reduced reading time by 82% (27 s per case). These results position X-VIG as a credible second reader for standardizing the reporting of knee osteoarthritis in routine clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.