ArticleNursing in critical care2026
Intensive Care Nurses' Experiences and Attitudes Towards Family Involvement in Delirium Care: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.
Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelirium is a common neuropsychiatric complication among critically ill patients, particularly those who are mechanically ventilated. Evidence suggests family involvement may improve delirium-related outcomes in adult intensive care units (ICUs). However, limited evidence exists on intensive care nurses' (ICNs) experiences and attitudes towards family involvement in delirium care in South Africa.
aimsThe study aimed to explore intensive care nurses' experiences and attitudes towards family involvement in the care of mechanically ventilated patients with delirium in adult ICUs. STUDY
designA descriptive qualitative study design was utilised. Four focus group discussions were conducted with 32 ICNs from two adult ICUs at a tertiary academic hospital in Johannesburg between April and August 2022. Participants who had at least 2 years of intensive care experience were purposively sampled. Data were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis. The study adhered to Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies guidelines.
findingsThree categories were identified: emotional burden and psychological demands of delirium care, communication and psychosocial support for families in delirium care and barriers to effective family involvement in delirium care. While recognising the therapeutic value of family engagement, the nurses reported experiencing emotional stress related to family expectations and anxiety. They adopted strategies such as structured communication, empathetic listening and technology-assisted contact to support families. However, barriers such as time constraints, limited intensive care space, staffing shortages and restrictive policies limited sustained involvement.
conclusionsThis study provides context-specific insight into how ICNs facilitate family involvement in the care of patients with delirium in a public tertiary ICU. ICNs recognise the therapeutic value of family involvement in the care of patients with delirium and are willing to facilitate engagement. However, systemic and environmental barriers limit consistent implementation. Therefore, strengthening institutional policies and supporting nurses through structured training and team-based approaches may enhance sustainable family-centred delirium care. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study's findings demonstrate the need for ICNs to adopt structured communication strategies, flexible visitation policies and empathy towards families and their patients in the ICU. Perhaps incorporating family-centred care into daily intensive care practices could strengthen family involvement in critical care, particularly for patients with delirium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.