SynthesisStress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress2026
A Systematic Review of Interventions to Support Health, Wellbeing, and Job Satisfaction for Emergency Call Handlers in the Ambulance, Police, and Fire Services.
Synthesis in Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency call handlers (ECH) in ambulance, police, and fire services experience high levels of occupational stress which can have adverse health consequences. To systematically review interventions to support the health, wellbeing and employment of ECH working in the emergency services. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, academic databases and grey literature were searched [Last search: 06/02/25]. Studies of any design assessing physical or mental health or employment outcomes were eligible. Screening and quality appraisal were conducted independently, with data extraction completed and cross checked by two reviewers. The JBI family of tools was used to assess quality and risk of bias. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were narratively synthesised into four categories: psychoeducation and resilience training, residential recovery programme, organisational wellbeing initiatives, and multicomponent interventions. Sample sizes ranged from n = 9 to n = 4020. The majority of interventions identified aimed to improve mental health, while physical health and employment outcomes were less frequently assessed. There was significant heterogeneity in study design which limited comparability between the studies. Most studies included a mixed sample of ECH and first responders and the methodological quality of included studies was variable. Some studies employed rigorous designs (e.g., RCTs), whilst others relied on observational methods. The included studies also demonstrated organisational barriers to the delivery of interventions in these settings. There was limited evidence for the effectiveness of interventions for supporting health and wellbeing or reducing stress amongst ECH. There is a need for role-specific interventions for ECH. SYSTEMATIC REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO: CRD42025639271.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.