ArticleDevelopmental science2026
Positive Peer Groups Support Preschoolers' Word Learning.
Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Positive Peer Groups Support Preschoolers' Word Learning.Developmental science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Children learn language from their social partners, and differences in the behavior of these social partners can influence language learning outcomes. The literature largely focuses on adult caregivers; however, there is less clarity regarding the extent to which the social behavior of peers might also impact children's language learning. Children spend a large proportion of their time with peers once they enter preschool; peers are thus an important source of input for learning. Moreover, preschoolers are not just interacting with individual peers but also with groups of peers. To explore the impact of peers' social behavior on preschoolers' word learning, the present study manipulated peer behavior at two levels: individual peers and the peer group context. Forty-four preschoolers (36-60 months) completed a tablet task in which they watched a series of animated videos of a classroom. Participants were exposed to (1) either a positive or negative social group (manipulated between-subjects) and (2) a positive and negative individual (manipulated within-subjects). Participants were then taught four novel object-label pairings by the children in the video. We measured preschoolers' accuracy in learning these novel object-label pairs. Overall, preschoolers learned the words above chance and there was no difference in learning from the positive and negative individual peers. However, participants learned words significantly better in the positive group than in the negative group. This pattern of results suggests that peer groups, and the overall affective context of children's learning environments, may play important roles in boosting preschoolers' language learning trajectories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.