Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42844717›Full record

ArticleInfancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies

Sensory Hyper-Sensitivity Associates With Poor Infant Sleep and Different Parental Sleep Practices, in a UK Cohort.

Teodora Gliga, Hope Fincham, Anna De Laet, Rachael Bedford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Sensory Hyper-Sensitivity Associates With Poor Infant Sleep and Different Parental Sleep Practices, in a UK Cohort.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Teodora GligaSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8053-7286
Hope FinchamSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Anna De LaetSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Rachael BedfordDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Brain and Behavior, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8581-055X

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 217469/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep difficulties (e.g., increased sleep onset latency and more frequent night awakenings) are common in early development and are associated with increased parental stress. Sleep difficulties have been linked to sensory hypersensitivity in typically developing infants and infants with family history of autism. In the current study, we investigate whether infant sensory sensitivity is associated with the strategies parents employ when settling infants to sleep. Strategies encouraging autonomy, rather than those involving active physical comforting, have previously been shown to lead to better sleep. We report findings from a cross-sectional UK sample of 245 infants aged 6-13 months, from which we collected online parent-report measures of infant sleep and sensory sensitivity (ITSP). We replicate previous findings showing that poorer sleep is correlated with higher infant sensory sensitivity. We then show an association between higher infant sensory sensitivity and more frequent use of all settling strategies, as well as a higher number of different strategies used. A strong correlation between infant and maternal sensory sensitivity precluded testing whether parental settling strategies are driven by infant or parental sensory sensitivity. The current findings emphasize the need to integrate information about intrinsic (e.g., infant sensitivity) and social environment factors (e.g., parental sensitivity, settling strategies) to understand infant sleep.

Indexed as

SleepCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant BehaviorMaleUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID42844717
PMCPMC13646340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.