ReviewJournal of hematology & oncology2026
Current and future therapies for acute myeloblastic leukemia.
Review in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has undergone a remarkable transformation over the past decade, as advances in genomic profiling and drug development have expanded therapeutic options and enabled increasingly personalized treatment approaches. This review summarizes the evolving therapeutic landscape of AML, including current intensive and lower-intensity treatment backbones, approved molecularly targeted therapies, and emerging investigational strategies. We discuss the role of intensive cytarabine plus anthracycline-based regimens and venetoclax-based lower-intensity approaches, as well as targeted therapies directed against FLT3, IDH1/2, NPM1, and KMT2A-rearranged AML. We further examine efforts to optimize existing treatment paradigms through the incorporation of venetoclax into intensive chemotherapy, rational targeted combinations, and novel triplet regimens, in addition to the emerging use of highly active lower-intensity therapies in younger fit patients. Finally, we highlight promising future directions in AML, including therapies targeting RAS/MAPK signaling, emerging approaches for TP53-mutated disease, and immunotherapeutic strategies. AML treatment is rapidly evolving from broadly applied chemotherapy-based approaches toward increasingly molecularly informed and individualized therapeutic strategies. Continued advances in molecular diagnostics, targeted therapies, and synergistic combination regimens have the potential to further increase remission durability, reduce relapses, and improve long-term outcomes for patients with AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.