ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
"It's a black box": Physiotherapists' perspectives on sensorimotor control and the use of technology in this context to improve rehabilitation following ACL injury.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries commonly occur in non-contact situations, implicating that underlying deficits in sensorimotor control may contribute to both primary and secondary injury risk. Physiotherapists play a central role in rehabilitation and have opportunities to advance recovery by use of technology targeting sensorimotor control. The integration of technologies such as wearable sensors, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence methods may support more objective assessment and context-related training after ACL injury, but clinical implementation remains limited. This study explored physiotherapists' perspectives on sensorimotor control, including their view on how technology may support its assessment and rehabilitation following ACL injury.
methodsA qualitative design was used, comprising six digital focus group discussions with 22 physiotherapists experienced in ACL rehabilitation (median experience 7 years, range 3-27), with current positions including generalist physiotherapists, clinical specialists and researchers. Discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using an inductive approach and reflexive thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke).
resultsThe analysis generated three themes: (1) Calling for measurable indicators of movement quality (2), Integrating technology as a meaningful complement to clinical assessment, and (3) Extending rehabilitation beyond the clinical walls. The physiotherapists called for methods to assess movement quality with outcome measures relevant to functional recovery and ACL re-injury risk. Although technologies were viewed as potentially supportive for assessment and rehabilitation, their added clinical value remained somewhat unclear. Adoption of technology was perceived to depend on the demonstration of clear clinical benefits, integration with clinical reasoning, and adaptation to emerging shifts in rehabilitation structures.
conclusionsThe physiotherapists expressed interest in technology to support sensorimotor assessment and rehabilitation after ACL injury. However, implementation was limited by uncertainty regarding the clinical value of sensorimotor outcomes. Future research needs to establish sensorimotor outcomes that are relevant for functional performance and/or re-injury risk and investigate whether educating physiotherapists in emerging technologies will improve the understanding of their potential and limitations as well as stimulate increased use. Co-creation between physiotherapists, researchers, and technology developers may help align emerging technologies with clinical workflows and reasoning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.