Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42844548›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026

Moral Infrastructure in Medicine: Conditions for Honest Work.

Sherry M Adkins, Ronald M Epstein

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sherry M AdkinsWright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, USA. sherry.adkins@wright.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9387-077X
Ronald M EpsteinDepartments of Family Medicine and Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What happens when clinicians know what good care requires, but the conditions of work make it difficult to realize? Through scenes from primary care, we describe moral infrastructure: the conditions that allow clinicians to notice what matters and respond to it in ordinary work. Compressed time, fragmented attention, and weakened continuity do not erase professional responsibility, but they can make it harder for clinicians to respond with integrity. Moral infrastructure does not label an organization moral or immoral, nor does it guarantee good outcomes. Rather, it complements organizational ethics by asking whether the conditions of work support or erode clinicians' capacity for moral attention, judgment, and response. Protecting those conditions matters for patients, clinicians, professional formation, and medicine's ability to remember what humane care requires.

Indexed as

moral distressmoral infrastructurephysician well-beingprimary careprofessional formationrelational care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.