Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42844534›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2026

Application of Pharmacometric Modelling Towards Precise Dosing in Neonates, Infants and Toddlers: A Scoping Review.

Ana S Rodríguez-Báez, Nina Kreuzberger, Claire Iannizzi, Kamran Irfan, Frederike Lentz, Anna Krueger, Norbert Benda, Ulrich Jaehde

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana S Rodríguez-BáezDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg, 53121, Bonn, Germany. arodrigu@uni-bonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8403-0287
Nina KreuzbergerFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Public Health, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8922-0488
Claire IannizziFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Public Health, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Kamran IrfanNational Institute of Research in Agronomy (INRA), Université d´Avignon et des Pays du Vaucluse, UMR Emmah, Avignon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7304-9049
Frederike LentzBiostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Germany.
Anna KruegerBiostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Germany.
Norbert BendaBiostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5605-2414
Ulrich JaehdeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg, 53121, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2493-7370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the biggest challenges in the youngest paediatric population (≤ 2 years) is defining a safe and effective dose. Thus, growth and maturation are crucial aspects to consider when pharmacometric (PMX) approaches are applied to estimate key pharmacokinetic parameters that guide dose selection. Derived from this, diverse methodologies and mathematical functions have been proposed. However, there is currently no clear consensus on the use of pharmacometric approaches to guide model-based precision dosing in newborns, infants and toddlers.

aimThis scoping review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current research status on the use of pharmacometric models for precise dosing in neonates, infants and toddlers.

methodsThis scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched from 1 January 2014 to 14 May 2025. Eligible were studies that applied PMX approaches in the youngest population. Data were extracted to identify scaling and maturation functions applied to guide paediatric dosing. Results were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review checklist.

resultsFrom 57 studies included, the most commonly applied PMX approaches were population pharmacokinetics (75%) followed by physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling (25%). Main application areas included antimicrobial therapy (30%), antiepileptic therapy (12%) and antineoplastic therapy (10%). The most commonly used allometric approaches were the fixed allometric scaling exponent based on a power function (37%), diverse exponents  on body weight (34%), anatomical and physiological scaling (19%), others (8%) and not reported (2%), with normalisation primarily to standard adult body weight (36%) or the median value (27%) and applied to total clearance, intercompartmental clearance and volume of distribution. Maturation functions were typically incorporated using sigmoidal (49%), power (8%), exponential (7%) or linear functions (4%), depending on post-menstrual or post-natal age.

conclusionThis review provides an overview of commonly applied PMX approaches in paediatrics, emphasising the importance of including allometry and maturation functions, and shows the variety of methodological strategies used to guide paediatric dose selection in the youngest population.

Identifiers

PMID42844534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.