ArticleOecologia2026
Flooding with brackish water disrupts Liriodendron tulipifera sap flux in an ecosystem-scale experiment.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coastal forests are retreating due to sea‑level rise and extreme precipitation events, yet the physiological mechanisms that precede woody plant decline remain poorly constrained. We used the ecosystem‑scale TEMPEST (Terrestrial Ecosystem Manipulation to Probe the Effects of Storm Treatments) experiment; annual, plot‑level freshwater and saltwater flooding of a mid‑Atlantic deciduous forest, to quantify short‑ and long‑term responses of sap flux in three tree species: Acer rubrum, Fagus grandifolia, and Liriodendron tulipifera. We analyzed five years of sap flux density measurements (2021-2025) using a Before-After Control-Impact (BACI) framework and linear mixed‑effects models to assess short and long-term changes in tree hydraulic function. Across the study period, species differed markedly in their responses to repeated flooding. A. rubrum showed no significant change in sap flux density under any treatment, while F. grandifolia exhibited plot‑specific increases or decreases consistent with relief from drought in the freshwater treatment plot. L. tulipifera sap flux density increased over time in all plots, but increases were dampened in the freshwater plot and strongly suppressed under saltwater flooding. Soil electrical conductivity rose progressively in the saltwater plot and emerged as a key predictor of both immediate and cumulative reductions in L. tulipifera sap flux density. As L. tulipifera constitutes a large share of canopy basal area in this coastal forest, continued saltwater intrusion is poised to accelerate mortality and drive ecosystem state-change. Our findings illustrate how ecosystem‑scale manipulations can uncover physiological thresholds relevant to coastal forest vulnerability under future sea‑level rise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.