ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Organization of Interventional Neuroradiology in Belgium: results of a national survey.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo provide a comprehensive national overview of interventional neuroradiology (INR) in Belgium through a structured survey conducted under the auspices of the Belgian Society for Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology (BSITN). MATERIALS AND
methodsAn anonymized online survey was distributed by email through the BSITN to all known active interventional neuroradiologists. The questionnaire assessed workforce demographics, organization of INR services, procedural activity, on-call systems, training and certification pathways, and remuneration models. Associations were tested using Fisher's exact or chi-square tests. Workforce projections were estimated using a stock-flow model based on respondent age distribution and current training pipeline capacity.
resultsThirty-five interventional neuroradiologists responded, representing more than 70% of the estimated active INR workforce in Belgium. Respondents were predominantly senior physicians (88.6%), with nearly half reporting more than 10 years of post-fellowship practice. Annual center-level procedural volumes were high, exceeding 200 cases in two-thirds of responses. Despite this variability, 68.6% of respondents felt sufficiently exposed across the full spectrum of INR procedures. Greater professional experience (> 10 years) was strongly associated with perceived procedural sufficiency (p = 0.001). A 24/7 stroke unit was available for 33 of 35 physicians. Workforce projections indicated a potential decline of approximately 23% over the next decade under current training capacity.
conclusionsThis national BSITN survey reveals significant variability in Belgian INR organizational models. The results of the survey also point to challenges related to workforce sustainability, training standardization, and service organization. As such, they can serve as a reference point for coordinated national initiatives. KEY POINTS: Question While procedural efficacy of INR is well established, the organizational structures, workforce characteristics, and training pathways that underpin INR services have not been systematically described at a national level. Findings This study showed significant variability in institutional models, on-call systems, training pathways, and remuneration across centers. While a 24/7 stroke unit was available for 33 of 35 physicians, workforce projections indicated a potential 23% decline in the active INR workforce by 2035 under current training capacity. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: These data establish the first national organizational baseline for Belgian INR and identify an impending workforce shortfall that threatens the sustainability of time-critical neurovascular services. The strong professional consensus favoring a standardized national training curriculum provides a clear mandate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.