ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Radiology research platform: automating multicenter radiological research workflows using a cloud-native platform.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large-scale, multi-institutional radiological datasets, requisite for next-generation AI and epidemiological studies, remain an unmet need due to fragmented infrastructure, institutional firewalls, and the laborious manual entry of data into research-specific electronic data capture tools. We present a proof-of-concept, cloud-native platform to facilitate multicenter radiological collaboration. The platform architecture enforces a clean separation between a React-based client UI, a cloud backend in Google Firebase, and secure local networks. The image data and metadata of each institution are securely and locally hosted through a localized edge-node Orthanc DICOM server. Critical metadata are reverse-proxied to the cloud database via REST APIs, negating any need for complicated virtual private network setups. Using dynamic JSON-based structured evaluation forms and enrollment algorithms such as consensus or fixed-volume study designs, PIs define clinical workflows to be dynamically pushed to radiologists, who then evaluate pending cases within a single workspace, including an embedded zero-footprint Open Health Imaging Foundation viewer and a standardized reporting form. KEY POINTS: Question How can radiologists from multiple sites and institutions participate in collaborative research projects without requiring VPN configurations or hardware shipments? Findings A cloud-native platform based on localized edge nodes and a zero-footprint web viewer enabled automated synchronization of imaging metadata and dynamic assignment of evaluation queues, eliminating manual data curation steps and streamlining radiologist workflows. Clinical relevance This application overcomes complex IT barriers and bypasses manual data entry to speed up the generation of radiological datasets and studies. Consequently, it accelerates the development of novel protocols and guidelines for patient care worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42844398What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.