Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42844390›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2026

Predicting resistance evolution to guide antibiotic development.

Csaba Pál, Petra Szili, Szilvia Juhász

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Csaba PálSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, Szeged, Hungary. cpal@brc.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5187-9903
Petra SziliSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, Szeged, Hungary.
Szilvia JuhászSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, Szeged, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7991-5438

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance has emerged as a major bottleneck in antibiotic development, frequently undermining promising drug candidates and negating years of research and pharmaceutical investment. Despite growing recognition of this issue, discovery pipelines still emphasize potency and target specificity whereas resistance potential is often considered later in the development process. Predicting resistance remains challenging owing to the diversity of genetic mechanisms, species-specific adaptive pathways and potential side effects of resistance on bacterial viability. However, technological advances now enable systematic mapping of resistance evolution, the dissemination of resistance genes and prediction of the clinical impact. To improve early identification of resistance-prone antibiotic candidates, it is crucial to evaluate five key parameters, including de novo resistance evolvability across pathogens, resistance-fitness-virulence trade-offs, resistance stability, cross-resistance potential and health risk of resistance genes. Integrating these factors provides a systematic, resistance-based framework for classifying new antibiotic candidates and guiding compound prioritization and refinement. Utilizing this framework within the antibiotic development pipeline shifts resistance prediction from retrospective observation to a prospective guiding principle in drug design.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.