Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42844369›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026

Role of extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with colorectal neoplasia who underwent minimally invasive colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol.

Nouf AlMarzooqi, Laurence Robert, Liane S Feldman, Sender Liberman, Lawrence Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nouf AlMarzooqiColon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9583-1507
Laurence RobertSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Liane S FeldmanDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sender LibermanColon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Lawrence LeeColon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada. larry.lee@mcgill.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with colorectal cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to malignancy-associated hypercoagulability and the physiologic stress of surgery. Current guidelines recommend extended-duration thromboprophylaxis for up to 28 days following major abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery. However, its effectiveness in patients managed by Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways is uncertain. This study evaluated the effectiveness of extended thromboprophylaxis after minimally invasive colorectal resection managed within a mature ERAS program in reducing clinically significant VTE.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted including all adult patients undergoing elective minimally invasive colorectal resection for neoplasia at a high-volume Canadian academic centre between 01/2016 and 12/2024. Patients undergoing open surgery, emergency procedures, or receiving therapeutic anticoagulation were excluded. All patients received standard in-hospital thromboprophylaxis. Extended thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin 5000 U for 28 days post-discharge was provided at the physician's discretion before 03/2018 and was subsequently included in the ERAS protocol. The primary outcome was symptomatic post-discharge VTE within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included bleeding complications, length of stay, emergency department visits, and readmissions.

resultsA total of 1043 included in the primary analysis after excluding inpatient VTE events (n=351 patients did not receive extended prophylaxis, n=692 received extended prophylaxis). The incidence of post-discharge VTE was 0.5% (6/1043). There was a higher incidence of VTEs in the -eDVTp group compared to the +eDVTp group [5/351(1.4%) vs. 1/692 (0.1%), p=0.010]. Post-discharge VTE was significantly higher in patients who did not receive extended prophylaxis compared with those who did (1.4% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.010). There were no significant differences in overall or clinically significant bleeding between groups.

conclusionsIn patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal resection within a mature ERAS pathway, the incidence of symptomatic post-discharge VTE is very low. Although extended thromboprophylaxis was associated with a statistically significant reduction in VTE events, the absolute risk reduction was small.

Indexed as

Colorectal surgeryEnhanced recovery after surgeryVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.