Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42844363›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2026

Boosting CAR T cell efficacy in cancer with metabolic insights from design to diet.

Jessica Morgan, Sarah MacPherson, Julian J Lum

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica MorganTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Research Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5380-0447
Sarah MacPhersonTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Research Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Julian J LumTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Research Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. jjlum@bccancer.bc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5624-3541

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has advanced the treatment of haematological cancers, but faces challenges achieving durable responses, particularly in solid tumours. Metabolism is a major determinant of CAR T cell fitness, persistence and function. The choice of co-stimulatory domain induces distinct metabolic profiles within the CAR T cell, making it crucial to consider engineering approaches that favour T cell metabolic phenotypes conducive to sustained antitumour activity. Likewise, variations in manufacturing platforms and expansion conditions, including nutrient composition, lead to distinct metabolic and functional profiles, yet the metabolic parameters in manufacturing protocols for clinical studies remain largely unstandardized. Beyond intrinsic cellular engineering, host metabolism exerts a sizeable influence on therapeutic outcome. Diet-based interventions offer a clinically accessible and scalable way to modulate systemic metabolism, which may in turn enhance CAR T cell efficacy. In this Review, we examine how metabolism integrates with CAR design, cell production and host conditioning. We highlight opportunities to leverage diet as a promising, underexplored avenue towards overcoming current barriers in treating solid tumours with CAR T cell therapy. Integrating metabolic and dietary strategies may unlock the potential for durable, effective CAR T cell therapy.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.