ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2026
Next-generation immune cell engagers for B cell depletion in autoimmune diseases.
Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune cell engagers (ICEs) offer a promising approach for achieving deep depletion of pathogenic B cell populations in systemic autoimmune diseases. Their modular design enables the recruitment of T cells, natural killer cells, γδ T cells or myeloid cells to eliminate B cells, plasmablasts and long-lived plasma cells. Use of ICEs in haematological malignancies has established the therapeutic potential of targeting the lineage antigens of B cells and plasma cells, and informed understanding of resistance, treatment-associated toxicity and incomplete target-cell depletion. However, applications in autoimmune diseases present distinct challenges, including disease-specific B cell heterogeneity, pharmacokinetic limitations, effector-cell dysfunction and the risk of cytokine release syndrome. Despite these challenges, early clinical reports using CD19-directed and B cell maturation antigen-directed T cell engagers have shown sustained improvements in several systemic autoimmune diseases. In this Review, we discuss the principles guiding ICE development for autoimmune diseases, including target selection, engager architecture, effector-cell recruitment and safety. We also consider emerging strategies, including CD8-biased T cell engagement, co-stimulatory multispecific formats, and natural killer or γδ T cell recruitment, to improve safety and durability of response. ICEs could ultimately provide an off-the-shelf alternative to chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies, enabling sustained immune reprogramming in patients with refractory autoimmune diseases.
Identifiers
42844361What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.