ReviewExperimental & molecular medicine2026
Insulin mimetics and non-canonical insulin receptor signaling: mechanisms and disease relevance.
Review in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insulin receptor (IR) signaling has traditionally been viewed as a canonical pathway in which insulin binding uniformly activates downstream metabolic and mitogenic responses. However, growing evidence indicates that IR signaling is not monolithic. Instead, IR signaling is increasingly recognized as a context-dependent process in which receptor conformation, spatial organization, and intracellular trafficking shape signaling outcomes. These non-canonical regulatory mechanisms generate distinct signaling states that can differentially regulate metabolic, mitogenic, immune, and neuronal functions. Recent advances in engineered insulin mimetics, including peptides, antibodies, aptamers, and de novo designed ligands, have provided powerful tools to probe this signaling diversity. By stabilizing specific receptor conformations or engagement geometries, these ligands can selectively bias downstream signaling programs. Here we discuss recent insights into how the qualitative features of IR signaling, rather than signaling amplitude alone, determine disease outcomes across diverse pathological contexts. Understanding this signaling diversity may enable the rational design of next-generation insulin mimetics and more precise therapeutic strategies targeting IR pathways.
Identifiers
42844349What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.