Observational studyNature communications2026
Deep learning CT signature for predicting early liver metastases in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Observational study in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately predicting the risk of early liver metastases (ELM) and identifying patients who are most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) are critical for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Here, we develop a Mamba-based predictive model that integrates imaging features from both the primary pancreatic tumor and the liver to assess the risk of ELM. The model is evaluated in a multi-institutional cohort of 1063 PDAC patients and demonstrates robust performance in predicting ELM (AUCs: 0.806-0.890). Besides, model-defined high-risk patients exhibit significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS: HR = 1.93, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS: HR = 1.89, p < 0.001). Notably, NAT confers significant OS benefits in model-defined high-risk patients (17.4 vs. 34.1 months; p < 0.001), even after propensity score matching (p = 0.004), while no survival benefit occurs in low-risk patients. Radiotranscriptomic analyses further reveal relative biological aggressiveness in the high-risk group. Overall, our proposed Mamba-based framework enables accurate prediction of ELM and may serve as a clinically actionable tool for identifying PDAC patients most likely to benefit from NAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.