ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026
Cross-ancestry and cross-disorder transferability of polygenic risk scores for obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have been conducted in European populations, limiting the understanding of OCD genetics across populations. Here, we investigated the cross-ancestry and cross-disorder transferability of European-derived polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for OCD in the first East Asian OCD cohort. We performed a GWAS in 532 Korean OCD cases and 4376 controls, followed by PRS analyses using European GWASs for OCD and 10 psychiatric disorders. The European-derived OCD PRS was significantly associated with Korean OCD status (best-fit R² = 1.17%). In multivariable models, PRSs for OCD (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-1.45), schizophrenia (SCZ; OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.03-1.32), and anorexia nervosa (AN; OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.03-1.32) were independently associated with OCD. A stepwise multi-PRS model including PRSs for OCD, AN, SCZ, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and bipolar disorder (BD) yielded the highest predictive performance (incremental R² = 2.99%). Where available, we evaluated PRSs derived from East Asian, European, and combined populations. For BD and SCZ, PRSs derived from cross-ancestry meta-analysis GWASs showed the greatest predictive performance for OCD, outperforming single-ancestry PRSs (incremental R² = 2.84 and 1.28%, respectively). Our findings demonstrate cross-ancestry transferability of OCD polygenic risk and highlight substantial genetic overlap between OCD and other psychiatric disorders, particularly SCZ and AN. Together, they underscore the importance of including diverse ancestral populations in psychiatric genetics and suggest that transdiagnostic polygenic frameworks may provide deeper insight into the biological basis of OCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.