ArticleBMJ open2026
My care, my choice: a qualitative phenomenological exploration of women's rights to choose maternal healthcare providers and services in Ari Zone, Southern Ethiopia.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMaternal health has shifted from a narrow focus on survival to a rights-based paradigm emphasising the quality of the birthing experience. This study explored participants' lived experiences in the Ari Zone, southern Ethiopia, regarding their right to choose their preferred maternal healthcare providers.
designA qualitative descriptive phenomenological study using face-to-face, semi-structured, in-depth interviews, analysed using Colaizzi's seven-step method with OpenCode software (V.4.2).
settingPublic maternal healthcare services in the Ari Zone, South Ethiopia Regional State, southern Ethiopia.
participants18 postpartum women (n=18), aged 20-39 years, purposively selected from women who had used maternal health services in the Ari Zone at least twice in the preceding 12 months.
resultsFour themes emerged. Participants described the healthcare environment as a rigid hierarchy in which top-down provider assignment and resource constraints constrained perceived choice and autonomy. The desire to select a provider was often described as a response to prior obstetric trauma or trusted community narratives about provider conduct. In the absence of formal choice, participants described informal strategies, such as timing visits to trusted shifts or emotionally withdrawing, to exert limited control over their care. They also envisioned person-centred care in which choice of provider was framed as integral to dignity and clinical safety.
conclusionsService coverage alone did not capture important dimensions of maternal healthcare quality, including dignity, autonomy and perceived choice. Participants described how provider assignment, limited information about available providers, resource constraints and concerns about provider conduct constrained their perceived ability to exercise choice. In the absence of formal mechanisms for choosing providers, some participants described informal strategies to retain limited control over their care. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening women's participation in decisions about their maternal healthcare and creating care environments that support dignity, respect and autonomy. The findings should be interpreted within the context of this qualitative study and should not be generalised beyond the study population and setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.