ArticleBMJ open2026
Short-term prophylactic biliary stenting after complete common bile duct stone removal to prevent post-ERCP cholangitis in Japan (STEP-ERCP study): study protocol for a confirmatory multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the standard treatment for common bile duct stones. Although complete stone removal can be achieved in most cases, post-ERCP cholangitis still occurs in a subset of patients, even in the absence of preprocedural cholangitis. Temporary prophylactic biliary stenting after complete stone extraction may reduce post-ERCP cholangitis by preventing transient biliary obstruction caused by papillary oedema, impaired bile drainage or residual biliary sludge. However, evidence supporting this strategy is currently limited to retrospective studies. The STEP-ERCP study is designed to test the hypothesis that short-term prophylactic biliary stenting after complete removal of common bile duct stones reduces the incidence of post-ERCP cholangitis compared with no biliary stenting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The STEP-ERCP study is a multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomised controlled superiority trial. Adult patients undergoing ERCP for common bile duct stones without evidence of acute cholangitis at the time of ERCP and achieving complete stone clearance will be enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to prophylactic biliary stenting using a spontaneous dislodgement biliary stent or no stenting. Randomisation will be stratified by participating institution and maximum stone diameter (<10 mm vs ≥10 mm). The primary endpoint is the incidence of post-ERCP cholangitis within 7 days after ERCP, diagnosed using modified Tokyo Guidelines 2018 criteria adapted for post-ERCP conditions. Secondary endpoints include cholangitis severity, time to cholangitis onset, therapeutic antibiotic use, repeat ERCP or biliary drainage, ERCP-related adverse events and revisit or readmission within 30 days after ERCP. A total of 186 participants will be enrolled. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects in Japan.The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yokohama City University Hospital on 11 May 2026. Additional approval will be obtained from participating institutions before study initiation.Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants.Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCT1032260128.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.