ArticleBMJ open2026
Professional and family caregivers' perceptions of death literacy in end-of-life home care: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe growing prevalence of chronic diseases and population ageing have increased the need for end-of-life care, particularly in home settings. Death literacy, encompassing knowledge, skills, attitudes and emotional preparedness related to death and dying, is recognised as an important component of quality end-of-life care. However, little is known about caregivers' perceptions of death literacy in the Iranian context.
objectiveTo explore the perceptions of professional and family caregivers regarding death literacy in home-based end-of-life care.
methodsThis qualitative study used conventional content analysis based on Graneheim and Lundman's approach. Data were collected through semistructured interviews with 12 professional and family caregivers involved in end-of-life care for patients with advanced chronic diseases in Tehran, Iran. Participants were recruited using purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed until data saturation was reached.
resultsFour core dimensions of death literacy emerged: (1) situational knowledge of dying, (2) experiential learning trajectory, (3) emotional reconciliation with death and (4) dignity-centred ethical practice. Two additional contextual domains (5) caregiver burden and relational challenges and (6) structural and organisational barriers described the relational and structural conditions in which death literacy was developed and enacted. Death literacy was described as a dynamic and culturally embedded process shaped by caregiving experiences, emotional engagement, informal learning, spirituality and interactions with families and the healthcare system.
conclusionDeath literacy develops through lived experience, emotional reflection and cultural influences rather than formal education alone, while relational and structural conditions shape how these capacities are developed and enacted in practice. Educational, psychological and organisational support may strengthen caregiver preparedness and improve end-of-life care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.