ArticleBMJ open2026
Determination of central pain modulation biomarkers to characterise patients with cancer and refractory pain: protocol for a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPain is one of the most prevalent and disabling oncological symptoms, but its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Most research has focused on peripheral mechanisms, while central pain modulation has been poorly explored. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) and electroencephalography (EEG) provide non-invasive approaches to assess central pain processing but the evidence using those approaches in patients with cancer is limited. This study protocol aims to identify and validate central biomarkers of pain perception and modulation (QST and EEG) and the role of moderator variables to better characterise patients with cancer pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study protocol describes a multicentre, cross-sectional, case-control study that will include a minimum of 470 ambulatory patients with cancer, including 313 with oncological pain and 157 without pain. Participants will be recruited taking into account age, sex and cancer type (lung, breast, pancreas, prostate and colon). All participants will perform a single face-to-face assessment that will include sociodemographic and clinical data, QST (pain modulation and inhibitory pain mechanisms, temporal summation and pain thresholds) and EEG (at rest and in response to thermal nociceptive stimuli) assessment and administration of questionnaires (pain, quality of life, fatigue, sleep, mood, etc). Statistical modelling and machine learning approaches will be used to investigate pain modulation biomarkers, their association with age and sex and to characterise patients with cancer pain. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval from all local ethics committees of the participating clinical sites. Results will be disseminated through high-impact peer-reviewed journals, international conferences and open data repositories, in compliance with General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles, and following the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) statement for observational case-control studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN35887998.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.