ArticleBMJ open2026
Evaluating the effect of spectacle correction for refractive errors and presbyopia on cognitive function in rural older adults in China: protocol for a randomised, parallel-group, superiority trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06836440 (The Impact of Spectacle Intervention for Refractive Error and Presbyopia on Cognitive Function in Rural Older Adults), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Impact of Spectacle Intervention for Refractive Error and Presbyopia on Cognitive Function in Rural Older Adults
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVision impairment and mild cognitive impairment are highly prevalent in ageing rural populations of low- and middle-income countries. Observational studies suggest that vision correction may slow cognitive decline, but robust causal evidence-particularly from rural China-is lacking, despite an ongoing randomised controlled trial (RCT) in India. Our RCT will evaluate whether providing near and/or distance vision correction can slow cognitive decline among older adults in rural China, generating context-specific evidence to guide national policy and global healthy ageing strategies.
methodsThis study is designed as an assessor-blind, parallel-group, individually RCT. A total of 964 participants (482 per arm) aged 60-79 years with correctable refractive error-related visual impairment at distance and/or near (presenting visual acuity <6/12 in the better-seeing eye, improving to ≥6/7.5 in either eye with spectacle and/or near visual acuity <6/12 at 40 cm when measured binocularly, improving to ≥6/7.5 in either eye with spectacle), rural household registration, normal hearing (defined as a hearing threshold <40 dB in at least one ear, assessed using the HearX HearTest) and Mini-Mental State Examination, Second Edition, Simplified Chinese version scores above education-specific cut-offs will be enrolled. After comprehensive eye examinations at township health centres or village clinics, intervention participants will receive distance, near or bifocal spectacles while controls will receive a prescription and spectacles at trial closeout. The primary outcome is the change in global cognitive function from baseline to the 36-month follow-up, assessed using the Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic, with and without adjustment for baseline score, age, gender, education and other potential confounders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol is approved by the Institutional Review Board of West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, China (approval number: (HXSY-BEC-S2026005)). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06836440, 21 April 2025, (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06836440).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.