Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42843401›Full record

ArticleNursing & health sciences2026

Machine Learning in Causal Effect Estimation and Causal Evaluation of ML-Enabled Interventions in Nursing-Related Research: A Scoping Review.

Dimitrios Kosmidis, Georgios Vlachopoulos, Abdulqadir J Nashwan, Rafael Lima Rodrigues de Carvalho, Breno Santos Araujo, Dimitra Armeni, Eleni Sertaridou, Sotiria Koutsouki

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing & health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dimitrios KosmidisDepartment of Nursing, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2376-5973
Georgios VlachopoulosDepartment of Nursing, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5490-2939
Abdulqadir J NashwanNursing & Midwifery Research Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4845-4119
Rafael Lima Rodrigues de CarvalhoEscola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-3748
Breno Santos AraujoEscola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7286-7322
Dimitra ArmeniDepartment of Nursing, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4230-9358
Eleni SertaridouMedical Department, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1540-8119
Sotiria KoutsoukiIntensive Care Unit, General Hospital of Kavala, Kavala, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9353-6781

Funding

HEAL-Link
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) informs nursing practice, but prediction cannot establish intervention or workflow effects. Aim To map ML use within causal effect estimation and causal evaluations of ML-enabled interventions in nursing and midwifery. Eight electronic sources were searched for reports published January 2015-June 2026, followed by backward citation searching. Eligibility required a causal estimand, corresponding identification strategy, substantive ML role, and nursing or midwifery relevance. Two reviewers independently screened records and full texts. Fifteen studies (17 reports) were included. Five addressed acute deterioration or sepsis; others covered care prioritization, falls, post-discharge care, and nurse- or midwife-led services. Five used ML within causal effect estimation to examine longitudinal and spillover effects, treatment-effect heterogeneity, and targeting strategies. Ten evaluated ML-enabled interventions or workflows; reported favorable effects on mortality, care escalation, message-review time, and nursing processes, while several controlled estimates were null or imprecise. Evidence remains small and methodologically uneven. Future studies should align estimands, identification strategies, analytic methods, and workflows and evaluate model-plus-workflow effects on nursing processes and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

CausalityMachine LearningNursing ResearchHumanscausal effect estimationcausal inferencecausal machine learningintervention evaluationmachine learningnursing researchscoping review

Identifiers

PMID42843401
PMCPMC13645453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.