ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2026
A systematic review of digital and wearable sensor data in the ABCD study: Insights, methods, and emerging opportunities.
Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research into key adolescent health domains, like problematic screen-based media use, sleep health, and physical activity, are frequently limited by error-prone self-report-based measures. To improve the measurement of such behaviors, the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (ABCD), a diverse longitudinal cohort study of nearly 12,000 U.S. youth (ages 9-10 at Baseline), includes remote sensing protocols during data collection. Consenting participants provided up to three weeks of Fitbit actigraphy data, beginning at the year-two follow up, and smartphone usage data, beginning at the year-four follow up, collected via the Effortless Assessment of Research Systems (EARS) smartphone application. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize all published empirical studies which have utilized the ABCD Study's passive sensor data, identifying 45 articles investigating measurement validity, and associations with adolescent health, development, and neurocognitive functioning. Fitbit devices broadly reproduced estimates of sleep and physical activity obtained from research-grade sensors. Smartphone sensor data were internally consistent, reproduced expected daily usage patterns, and were moderately correlated with self-report. Most substantive studies utilized Fitbit data and reported cross-sectional associations between sensor-derived single-item summary statistics and survey-based measures of mental and behavioral health, neurocognitive functioning, or environmental risk factors. A smaller number of studies utilized longitudinal designs, within-person analyses, machine learning approaches, and/or genetic or neuroimaging methods to reduce confounding and enhance biological and etiological insight into these observed relationships. While published findings were largely incremental in nature, ABCD's passive sensing resources nonetheless represent a powerful, widely available resource for incorporating sensor-based measures into adolescent health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.