Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42842902›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Approaches for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Diagnosis: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Benedict Onochie Ibe, Amir Aly, Shaymaa S Al-Juboori, Emmanuel Ifeachor, Rohit Shankar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benedict Onochie IbeSchool of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, England, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom, 44 07476836637.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8745-0881
Amir AlySchool of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, England, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom, 44 07476836637.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5169-0679
Shaymaa S Al-JubooriSchool of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, England, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom, 44 07476836637.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5175-736X
Emmanuel IfeachorSchool of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, England, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom, 44 07476836637.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8362-6292
Rohit ShankarSchool of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, England, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom, 44 07476836637.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1183-6933

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects over 366 million adults and 139 million children worldwide, yet diagnosis remains fundamentally subjective, relying on clinical interviews, behavioral observations, and rating scales that yield inconsistent results across practitioners and settings. Artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) offer a paradigm shift toward objective, data-driven diagnosis by detecting complex patterns across neuroimaging, electrophysiology, and digital biomarkers that elude conventional assessment. Although AI-based ADHD research has grown exponentially, no comprehensive synthesis examines the full spectrum of data modalities, validation practices, and clinical translation readiness. This gap limits our understanding of which approaches are most promising for real-world implementation. Objective: This scoping review will visually map the current evidence on AI-based ADHD classification with respect to predictive accuracy, data forms, data features, generalizability, and interpretability of models. Methods: This scoping review will use the Joanna Briggs Institute approach to scoping reviews and follow the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Five electronic databases (IEEE Xplore, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and ACM Digital Library) will be systematically searched for peer-reviewed studies published between January 2019 and April 2026. Empirical studies in English involving the use of AI, ML, DL, or explainable AI to diagnose ADHD with a total sample size greater than 100 participants (ADHD and control groups combined) and a non-ADHD control group (individuals with typical development or healthy individuals) will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles, abstracts, and full texts, and any conflicts will be resolved through either discussion or arbitration. A standardized Microsoft Excel template will be used to extract data that will include the following: bibliographic data, data modalities, data models, data validation approaches, performance metrics, and explainability approaches. Thematic and narrative analysis will be used to synthesize findings on 4 research questions that will address model performance, data modality contributions, data characteristics, and interpretability methods. Results: The scoping review began in December 2025. Analysis and screening are in progress, with the scoping review expected to be completed and submitted for publication in June 2026. Conclusions: This scoping review will provide the first comprehensive synthesis of AI-, ML-, and DL-based ADHD diagnostic classification studies, mapping the evidence across data modalities, validation practices, interpretability methods, and clinical translation readiness. Findings will inform future methodological standards and support the translation of AI-based diagnostic tools into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityDeep LearningMachine LearningHumansScoping Reviews as TopicADHDAIartificial intelligenceattention-deficit/hyperactivity disorderdeep learningdiagnostic classificationexplainable AImachine learningscoping review

Identifiers

PMID42842902
PMCPMC13645319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.